I put out the call at the end of yesterday's post and quarantine is still surely boring enough for someone to answer it!
Justice W did the hardcore sleuthing in answer to my questions and what they discovered is a delight for debate nerds everywhere. Thanks Justice! Did I fact check any of this? Certainly not. See yesterday's post for why the question is irrelevant. A. Same Policy 2NRs 1---GMU ML -Prolif DA (a lot) -Courts CP -Adv CPs -Trade DA (1) 2---Emory PR -Deterrence DA (a lot) -Deterrence CP -Assurance -JCS CP (1) -Fem IR (1) B. Most Distinct Policy 2NRs 1---Michigan MM (18) -T Subs -T Activation -A5 Pic -Inducements CP -Recission CP -Nuclear energy CP -Flexible response CP -Courts CP -Israel DA -Dollar Heg DA -Cred DA -Assurance DA -Deterrence DA -Bataille K -Budhism K -Bifo K -Wipeout -Presumption 2---NU FL/FW (19) (Both partnerships) -T alliance -T Subs -T Reduce -Prolif DA -Sanctions DA -ACB DA -I-LAW DA -Deterrence DA -Summit DA -Concessions DA -INF DA -Stimulus DA -Adv CP -Base PIC -Civil Guidance CP -CBA CP -Buffer States CP -China QPQ -Complexity K Honorable Mentions: Dartmouth TV (14 Policy, 10 K, 24 Total!!!) -Deterrence -Prolif -A5 Pic -Deterrence CP -Japan war powers DA -Spending CP -Inducements CP -Advantage CP (multiple) -T Reduce -Ex oficio -Flex response -T its -QPQ CP -Security K Dartmouth TV vs K -T USFG -Geo Turn -Decriminalization Turn -Atlantic K -Racial Cap K -Ontogenetic war K -Anthropocene K -Gibson Graham K -Syria CP -GND CP Emory GK (15) (a lot of T) -T Casus -T expansion -T Conditions -T Reduce -Prolif DA -Deterrence DA -Containment Bad DA -Populism DA -NAC CP -A5 Pic -Recommit CP -Deterrence CP -Case/Presumption -Syria Pic -Estonia Pic Michigan PR (15) -Stimulus -Con Con -Assurance -Deterrence -NAC -A5 Pic -Congress CP -T Activate -Russia integration CP -Accession CP -Recission CP -Security K -Esper DA -Flexible response CP -T Secret Kansas MR -T subs 5 times!!! -who cares C. Among first round applicant teams did the affirmative or negative win more T debates (in policy debates)? Neg---Won 71% of T Debates (12/17) DATA: Dartmouth TV (3-0) Kansas MR v Dartmouth TV – Enlargement -- NEG NU FL v Dartmouth TV – EDCA – NEG Michigan MM v Dartmouth TV -- SoKo -- NEG Emory GK (3-1) Dartmouth TV v Emory GK -- CSD -- AFF Wake KM v Emory GK -- Cyber Offense Pact -- NEG Kentucky DG v Emory GK – Expansion – NEG Berkeley EE v Emory GK – Kuril – NEG NU FW (2-0) Dartmouth TV vs NU FW – CSD – NEG NU FW vs Emory PR - Sweden NATO - NEG Kansas MR (3-1) Emory GK v Kansas MR – NATO Cyber -- AFF Wake KM vs Kansas MR – Cyber – NEG Samford EG vs Kansas MR – Liancourt – NEG Michigan MM vs Kansas MR – SoKo – NEG Michigan MM (0-1) NU FW vs Michigan MM – Secret Hybrid – AFF Michigan PR (1-1) Georgetown MW vs Michigan PR – Secret Senkaku – NEG NU FW vs Michigan PR – Secret Hybrid – AFF Wake KM (0-1) NU FL vs Wake KM – Turkey – AFF D. Who had the best 1NC when someone broke a new affirmative against them 1---Wake KM vs Dartmouth TV 1AC – New Okinotori 1NC – New Confer CP, New Trade/Inducement CP, New Japanese Warpowers DA, New Offensive strike Bad 2---Cal BW vs Kentucky DG (Doubles, Broke Round 6, Great 1NC for 1 round) 1AC – Kuril 1NC – Revision CP, New Separatism DA, New Territories DA, Bunch of specific case turns E. Corollary---did someone read a new affirmative where the negative had a specific strategy ready to go? 1---See Above 2---Michigan PR vs Dartmouth TV 1AC – New Arctic 1NC – New Congress CP, Arctic Deterrence CP, Arctic Deterrence DA 3---Most 2NRs vs New Affs were T or Prolif DA Honorable/Notable debates 1---Michigan MM vs Dartmouth TV 1AC---AI/Baudrillard/South Korea 2NC---AI Bad 2NR---Prolif and Article V Pic 2---Kansas MR vs Rutgers AH 1AC--Philippines K version – 1NC---Forces PIC, Humanitarian PIC, Terrorism DA, T, Fill in, Grove K 2NR---Forces PIC and Terrorism DA 2AR---Condo 3---USC KS vs Dartmouth TV – 1AC---Stack 1NC---Topicality, Japan PIC, Geoengineering CA,White Terrorists PIC, Cap Good Turn, AI Dominance Good Turn, Space Weapons Good Turn, COVID Turn, Satellites Turn, Money Laundering Turn 2NR---Geoengineering CA 4---USC vs Michigan PR 1AC---NEW Bmd 2NR---NEW Quantum K F. If you are a policy team what K team would you least like to go negative against? (Does the math back it up?) 1---Rutgers AH Won 81% debates v policy teams (13/16) Honorable Mentions: 1---USC---75% (18/24) 2---Wake CT---77% (9/11) G. If you are a K team what policy team would you least like to go affirmative against? (does the math back it up?) 1---Dartmouth TV (12-0) 2---Michigan PR (15-1) 3---Emory GK (6-0) H. What K team had the most diverse spread of arguments when negative? 1---USC (15!!!) USC -Cap K -Hybrid war K -Ecology K -Racial cap K -Cyber K -IR k -Redaction K -Culture K -Liberal money K -Quantam K -Praxis DA -A5 Pic -Assurance DA -Deterrence DA -Courts CP Comments are closed.
|
AuthorI am Lincoln, retired debate coach . This site's purpose is to post my ramblings about policy debate. Archives
November 2022
Categories |